Star of The Sound of Music Expressed Dislike for the Iconic Film – Sky Bulletin

by Vishakha Singh

[ad_1]

As he was rising to fame in the ’60s, Christopher Plummer was cast by director Robert Wise as Captain von Trapp in the renowned film. The movie showcased the talents of Julie Andrews, and together, Andrews and Plummer captured the hearts of audiences. Yet, despite The New York Times’ harsh criticism of Plummer’s acting, “The Sound of Music” went on to be a huge hit at the box office.

Plummer’s discontent with the film began during production and was made public in the following years. He shared his feelings with The Boston Globe in 2010:

“I was a bit bored with the character. Although we worked hard enough to make him interesting, it was a bit like flogging a dead horse. And the subject matter is not mine. I mean it can’t appeal to every person in the world. It’s not my cup of tea.”

Renaming the film as “The Sound of Mucus,” Plummer did not hold back his criticism. He described the film to The Hollywood Reporter as “awful and sentimental and gooey”, emphasizing the effort it took to add a hint of humor to the story.

Plummer’s initial acceptance of the part was largely a step towards his musical role in “Cyrano”, and his later comments suggest he regretted taking part in “The Sound of Music”. Despite his grumblings, all of his objections were delivered with a certain performative flair. Over time, Plummer did soften his stance and expressed a more nuanced view of the film that brought him widespread fame.

FAQ Section

  1. Why did Christopher Plummer dislike “The Sound of Music”?

    Plummer found the character uninteresting and the subject matter not to his personal taste, expressing that it was “not my cup of tea.” He also criticized the film for being overly sentimental.

  2. What nickname did Christopher Plummer use for “The Sound of Music”?

    He mockingly referred to the movie as “The Sound of Mucus.”

  3. Did Christopher Plummer’s opinion on the film change over time?

    Yes, although he initially expressed strong dislike for the film, he later softened his view and had a more appreciative take on it.

  4. What was the public and critical reaction to Plummer’s performance in the film?

    Despite The New York Times critiquing his performance, “The Sound of Music” was a box office success and loved by audiences.

Conclusion

Christopher Plummer’s candid reflections on “The Sound of Music” show the complexity of an actor’s relationship with his roles. Even though Plummer was not fond of the film, it remains an undisputed classic that continues to charm new generations. His initial reluctance and subsequent musings reflect the evolving nature of an actor’s critique of their work over time. Ultimately, “The Sound of Music” is as much a part of Plummer’s legacy as his more critically acclaimed performances.

[ad_2]